April 25, 2013
Download as PDF
View on The Scotsman
At the Modern Institute, the paintings of Nicolas Party set up their own connections to the past. Party is Swiss but is now based in Glasgow having studied on the MFA course at Glasgow School of Art, and this is his first major solo show in Scotland. A show of still lifes and landscape paintings seems anachronistic in the Modern Institute, and this one comes heavily laced with irony, but Party is in the business of making paintings nonetheless.
There are two distinct bodies of work here. The still lifes are meticulous collections of objects – jugs, bowls, coffee pots, fruit – usually in bright hues. They are almost reduced to shapes and colours. He plays with ideas of scale (the huge pear, the tiny olive, the over-elongated tulip vase), experiments with ideas of planes and surfaces, and with how colours balance one another – or don’t. All this puts him, to a greater or lesser extent, in a lineage of more than a century of still life painters.
His paintings are highly structured and well executed, if a little strange. His determination at staying with them – spending several months on a single painting – is reminiscent of Giorgio Morandi, who almost a century earlier painted the same bottles and jars over and over. But while Party’s still lifes are meticulous to the point of obsessiveness, his landscapes are more free-form: collections of set-piece bushes and trees in garish, improbable shades. They look like fantasy landscapes from children’s storybooks, as though Puff the Magic Dragon might appear at any moment, hand in hand with the Teletubbies. Unlike the still lifes, they don’t appear to be a serious engagement with paint, or with anything very much.
The most interesting thing about this show is why a former graffiti artist with impeccable contemporary art credentials is making work that seems so traditional in form. Yet this, too, is a matter of context. At the Modern Institute, it’s intriguing. Among submissions for the RGI or RSA, it would cause little more than a raised eyebrow. At least, the still lifes would. The landscapes would be in danger of being laughed out of town.
Party has said that painting is “a silent and motionless language”, and it is certainly true of his paintings, though there would be plenty of artists who would contest it. The paintings of New York-based artist Ella Kruglyanskaya, who has her first solo show in Europe with Kendall Koppe in Dixon Street downstairs from Mary Mary, are neither still nor silent. The women in them are animated, bitchy, challenging, scrutinising, trying to out-dress one another.
Her inspiration for this show is Dolly Parton, an icon of femininity who is open and frank about how manufactured her own image is. Despite her cleavage and big hair, Dolly is a very postmodern celebrity. There is much double-crossing in the representation of the female, and there are ironies and doubling throughout this show. In the history of painting, women were beautified for the male gaze, but also, through different types of representation, found a kind of liberation. All this Kruglyanskaya knows, but her contribution is characterised by playfulness.
As paintings, they are variable. Some are rough and cartoonish, drawn rather than painted, sometimes a character is crudely crossed out, but two in particular stand out. Reading Bather and Mustache Beach switch medium to egg tempera, and the change of medium seems to create a more serious, contemplative mood. Here she works with colour, figure and pattern, blurring the two in a vibe which recalls the painting of the 1920s and 30s. They are properly intriguing, and remind us that there is a lot of skill here, even if at times Kruglyanskaya prefers to throw away the rule book.